Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Al-Azzawi: We rule out passing an amendment to the Personal Status Law during this parliamentary ses

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 281112
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    Al-Azzawi: We rule out passing an amendment to the Personal Status Law during this parliamentary ses Empty Al-Azzawi: We rule out passing an amendment to the Personal Status Law during this parliamentary ses

    Post by Rocky Tue 13 Jul 2021, 7:20 am

    [size=45][size=41]Al-Azzawi: We rule out passing an amendment to the Personal Status Law during this parliamentary session[/size][/size]

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    Al Noor News/ Baghdad
    The Parliamentary Legal Committee ruled out the approval of the amendment of Article 57 of the Personal Status Law, which has sparked controversy in the recent period, indicating that the discussion of this law has been postponed due to the disagreement within the committee.
    A member of the Legal Committee, Rashid Al-Azzawi, confirmed, in a press interview, that “the amendment of Article 57 of the Personal Status Law has become a controversial subject inside and outside Parliament,” noting that “the amendment should be for the benefit of the child, not the custodian.”
    And he added, I tend to “give the judge the authority to know where the child’s interest is, because we see the children, some of them wronged by their father and some by the mothers, especially if the mother is not married, so we tend to amend the article by giving the social researcher and the judge, who are the ones who assess the circumstances of each case, so that the custodian is either The father or the mother or not both if they are not qualified and the state is responsible for the child.
    He explained, "The custody of the mother should not be absolute, but rather set at a time that may be 15 years or 7 years. All these matters, except for custody, should be left to the judge, who is the one who assesses the situation in favor of the mother or father."
    Al-Azzawi continued, "The committee postponed the discussion of this amendment, due to the large number of objections by the members of the committee to Article 57," ruling out that it would be "passed during this session."
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Fri 22 Nov 2024, 5:29 pm