"Frameworkers" are trying to convince the opponents within the bloc to stay Al-Kazemi for a longer t

POSTED ON[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] BY [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[size=52]"Frameworkers" are trying to convince the opponents within the bloc to stay Al-Kazemi for a longer time[/size]

[size=45]Baghdad / Tamim Al-Hassan[/size]
[size=45]For the second time in a matter of days, indications of moving the waters of stagnant politics for months come from the Kurdistan region, amid a tense atmosphere and talk of "threats".[/size]
[size=45]So far, it seems that all the papers that the political forces threw to get out of the crisis during the past 7 months did not come out with a solution, and what is stable is the continuation of Mustafa Al-Kazemi's government for a longer time.[/size]
[size=45]Despite the failure, what the side dialogues between some currents indicate is that there is a periodic review of all previous proposals, but it is a review that resembles “circulating in a vicious circle.”[/size]
[size=45]One of the suggestions was for Al-Kazemi to announce his resignation, so that the President of the Republic would be forced to assign the candidate of the largest bloc.[/size]
[size=45]In practice, the "triple alliance" is the largest bloc, according to what it announced in an official conference last March. Although he did not specify the number of its seats, estimates speak of 180 seats.[/size]
[size=45]This proposal collides with many legal and realistic obstacles, as there are no indications so far of the intention of the current prime minister, who is the head of a daily caretaker government, to submit his resignation.[/size]
[size=45]Also, submitting the resignation means, according to the latest interpretation of the Federal Court, that he remains the head of the caretaker government.[/size]
[size=45]This last interpretation is also the one who burned another proposal that was put forward and is sometimes discussed, that some ministers of Al-Kazemi’s government be changed, as a pressure card on the coordination framework.[/size]
[size=45]The Federal Reserve closed the door after it stated in its interpretation that the current government (a caretaker government) does not have the right to dismiss or appoint a minister or one of the important positions.[/size]
[size=45]Also, according to the same interpretation, the current parliament does not have the right to vote to dismiss the current ministers, because it is not the parliament that voted to appoint them, in reference to the previous parliament, which dissolved itself days before the early elections that took place last October.[/size]
[size=45]As for the dissolution of the new parliament, the Sadrist movement's circles, according to what they reported to (Al-Mada), that "one of the proposals that may be put forward again after the end of the movement's leader Muqtada al-Sadr's last deadline."[/size]
[size=45]If this option is actually proposed, it will also face a political and legal obstacle, as some forces close to the Sadrists, such as the Sunni Sovereignty Alliance, may refuse to go in this direction, especially since they have gained an important position in the parliament's presidency.[/size]
[size=45]This obstacle leads to the legal obstacle, because in the last statement of the Judicial Council on the procedures for dissolving parliament, it requires certain procedures and the vote of the majority of parliament members, and the rejection of some of the expected “tripartite” parties to dissolve the parliament, in addition to the declared refusal of the “coordinator,” which means the difficulty of achieving this goal. .[/size]
[size=45]The reviews of the political forces also indicate that there is an “adventure” in going again to early elections less than a year after the last elections, which took place last October and were also early, as it is natural that new elections will take place in the event the parliament is dissolved.[/size]
[size=45]The adventure lies in the possibility that the bases of some parties will be shaken due to what happened in the political crisis, and the fear of the expansion of the boycott audience, as the last elections recorded the lowest level of participation since 2005 (the first elections after 2003) with less than 45%.[/size]
[size=45]The “Al-Fatah” coalition, for example, which is one of the components of the coordination framework, lost about 30 seats from its results in 2018, when in 2021, it won only 17 seats, compared to about 50 seats in the previous elections.[/size]
[size=45]In addition, the political forces have to bear new costs for electoral propaganda after only months of spending money estimated at at least 8 million dinars per MP.[/size]
[size=45]The Electoral Commission had also granted a budget of 300 million dollars, which is equivalent to about 45 billion dinars.[/size]
[size=45]Sources from within the coordination framework also indicate that the latter cannot repeat the same mistake, which is accepting to run for elections again with the same election law.[/size]
[size=45]The "Coordination Committee" had considered the decline of its seats in the recent elections, due to the election law "which legislated according to the dimensions of the Sadrist movement", according to their claim. Therefore, if the "frameworkers" accept the re-election, they will demand a change to the law.[/size]
[size=45]According to this, what is leaking out of discussions between the political forces, the safest solution is to accept the current situation and the continuation of Mustafa Al-Kazemi’s government until finding a solution that satisfies all parties.[/size]
[size=45]Sources within the "Coordination Committee" say that "this idea is raised from time to time... Those who object to Al-Kazemi's stay can be persuaded."[/size]
[size=45]another solution![/size]
[size=45]On the other hand, there is another solution that may parallel the survival of "Al-Kazemi", a proposal that did not lose sight of the speeches and initiatives of the various political forces during the crisis, which is the merging of the two sides of the rivalry (the current) and (the framework) or part of the latter.[/size]
[size=45]The last proposal may be part of the initiative that is being talked about, which is supposed to be presented by the leader of the Kurdistan Democratic Party, Massoud Barzani.[/size]
[size=45]Some expectations indicate that the initiatives will not be able to deviate from the development of proposals to bring the views closer through a “peace” agreement or “merging some of the opposing parties.”[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sadr, according to circles close to the movement, "accepted all parties to the coordination framework, except for Nuri al-Maliki, the former prime minister, and Qais al-Khazali, the leader of Asa'ib Ahl al-Haq."[/size]
[size=45]Regarding the expected initiative, Abdul Salam Barwari, a member of the Democratic Party, said in an interview with (Al-Mada) that “the initiative is not on the table yet, but the political forces’ confidence in the party’s leader, Massoud Barzani’s ability to solve crises as he did in 2010 and 2014 prompts everyone to call him to intervene.” .[/size]
[size=45]Berwari had said earlier that the Kurdish initiative must be preceded by a willingness on the part of the political forces to start new dialogues.[/size]
[size=45]Berwari revealed at the time to Al-Mada that "a delegation from the party will arrive in Baghdad soon to feel the pulse of the political forces, and after that, the initiative may be launched."[/size]
[size=45]Talk about the "Kurdish solution" began to escalate with new meetings between the Kurdish forces taking place for the first time in 4 months.[/size]
[size=45]Yesterday, the President of the Kurdistan Region, Nechirvan Barzani, renewed his hope to open the way to settling differences in Baghdad, through meetings taking place in the region between the Democratic Party and its rival, the Patriotic Union.[/size]
[size=45]In a meeting yesterday with one of the ambassadors of European countries, the region's president stressed the importance of having a common vision and understanding between the Iraqi parties in order to reach a solution that would lead to overcoming the political closure and blockage.[/size]
[size=45]This statement came in a statement issued by the latter's office during his reception on Wednesday morning, Mark Bryson, the British ambassador to Iraq, and an accompanying political and military delegation.[/size]
[size=45]Shortly before that, the office of the region's president announced the date of a meeting between the president of the Kurdistan region, Nechirvan Barzani, and the head of the National Union Party, Bafel Talabani.[/size]
[size=45]A high-ranking employee in the office stated to Kurdish media, that a delegation from the Political Bureau of the Democratic Party is scheduled to meet today, Wednesday (yesterday), with a delegation from the Political Bureau of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, in the presence of the President of the Kurdistan Region, Nechirvan Barzani, and the President of the Patriotic Union, Bafel Talabani.[/size]
[size=45]This development came after the last meeting that took place recently, between the president of the region and the leaders of the "Union" and other Kurdish parties in Sulaymaniyah.[/size]
[size=45]According to Abdul Salam Berwari, "there is a meeting soon at the summit level that will take place between the two parties (the Democratic Union and the Union)."[/size]
[size=45]Some of the leaks had considered that the Kurdish-Kurdish agreement might harm the "coordinating framework" because it would increase the seats of the "troika" front, and it may have been behind the recent escalation of the group calling itself the "Iraqi Resistance".[/size]
[size=45]This group had accused the President of the Kurdistan Regional Government, Masrour Barzani, of training "subversive groups" in the region under the auspices of Israel, to strike vital targets in the country, which was rejected by the authorities in the Kurdistan region, and threatened a violent response to any aggression against it.[/size]
[size=45]Most political forces view the convergence of the two main Kurdish parties as ending half of the government formation node, as it is hoped that the two parties will agree on one candidate for the presidency, which in turn will assign the candidate of the largest bloc to form the government.[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]