Federal Court challenging the Judicial Council Law and rejects, however, the parliament blocks wage

Federal Court challenging the Judicial Council Law and rejects, however, the parliament blocks wagering

 Baghdad / term

The Federal Court dismissed, on Tuesday, appealed to paragraphs 4 out of 5 made by the Supreme Judicial Council, regarding the law passed by the House of Representatives earlier this year, while the postponed consideration of the appeals made by the government on the budget law.
The Judicial Council seeks to escape from the grip of the parliament granted to himself through the items to give it the right to nominate members of the Judicial Council and members of the Courts of Appeal, and their offer to a vote, which necessarily means subjecting the judiciary to seizing political blocs.
Said Abdul Sattar Bayraktar, the official spokesman of the Supreme Judicial Council, in a statement received (range) a copy of it, that " the Federal Supreme Court decided not to constitutional paragraphs objected to by the Supreme Judicial Council in its law No. 45 of 2017, with the exception of paragraph relating to the placement of an employee to work decision the Supreme Judicial Council. "
The Supreme Judicial Council has announced nearly a month ago, for submitting an appeal with a number of paragraphs of law No. (45) for the year 2017 before the Federal Supreme Court more than two months after the passing of the bill in the House of Representatives. The following are some of the paragraphs in which challenged the Judicial
Council: the fifth paragraph of Article V , which provides for the appointment of subordinate gentlemen Vice - Presidents of the Federal Cassation Court and the heads of the federal courts of appeal to the House vote.
The second paragraph of Article V concerned the nomination of members of the Federal Supreme Court.
The third paragraph of the fifth article , which stipulates the Federal Supreme Court within the budget of the federal judiciary 's budget.
The third paragraph of the sixth article under which formed a circle of judicial investigators and judicial assistants.
The second paragraph of Article V , which stipulates the creation of the post of Rapporteur of the Supreme Judicial Council.
In another context, the Federal Supreme Court decided to defer consideration of the appeal contained in the paragraphs of the budget law for the current year to the eighth of next month, according to a statement last received (range), a copy of it.
According to the statement, " the Supreme Federal Court heard today a lawsuit to challenge some of the paragraphs of the Budget Law for the year 2017, and decided to postpone consideration until the eighth of next month for a number of reasons . First in order to allow the defendant (Chairman of the House of Representatives in addition to his job), to answer on the list of the Prosecutor (Prime Minister , in addition to his job). "
The statement pointed out that the Federal Court , " The second reason has to notify (Minister of Finance in addition to his job) The fact that a third person decides to enter it in order to stand on the resolution of the case requirements."
He pointed out that " the court charged with the prosecutor to prepare a table in which the contested articles explains unconstitutional to submit before the date of the hearing and communicated to the rest of the parties."
The statement went on to "question his destination court to the plaintiff respect to the amount of the total budget of the project submitted by the Council of Ministers, and the voter by law and published in the facts of Iraq after making amendments added by the House of Representatives to be ready to answer during the delay notice, and submit to the Court and the parties during a period not exceeding seven days from the date of the next hearing. "
The government surprised the House of Representatives, the middle of last month, submitting an appeal to 21 items of the 2017 budget items, including a claim to cancel paragraph 15, and the reformulation of other paragraphs.
The appeals affect items important stocks included within the budget to speed up recognition of the process, as provisions petrodollar, claimed by the southern provinces, and a review of the oil licensing rounds for decades.
The government also appealed for allocated to the provinces border ports of revenue, and the allocation of the Peshmerga , which carved out of the military budget.
The government also challenged clause states to stop appointments in the three presidencies, and the proportion of staff cuts that parliament plese to 3.8 instead of 4.8. The House of Representatives has succeeded for the first time to pass the budget unanimously, the end of last year, at the time specified prior to the end of the fiscal year.


[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]