Our choices in economic management

Our choices in economic management



04/03/2017 0:00

Dr.. On behalf of the Patriarchs
Iraq's new constitution has been shaping the Iraqi economy on the basis of decentralization in the administration horizontally and vertically and the sharing of wealth among the people in the framework of social justice beyond the past consequences of the recent and tragedies, but the supervisor notes that we are so far we did not find a definition we agree about what you stated above, not between center and the region or provinces on the one hand and between the same ministries or with some of its directorates
On the other hand.
Is what is happening is a certain decentralization or he Amrkzina or her definition? Is it permissible to stand provinces against the application of federal legislation , for example , because he is opposed to their interests? Is it permissible for some of the general directorates that ministerial orders opposed because they tend to conservatives?
These examples have multiplied in recent years and perhaps topped the scene of Kirkuk and Basra governorates , and that if we exclude problems with the province of
Kurdistan.
I say quite frankly I am against the central economic management, this approach does not fit today with developments in the global economy in recent decades, but I completely agree with a central holistic vision of economic participants geographically and strategically that those participants clearly define unambiguous, leaving other things other administrative levels without central.
Part of each and all part of the famously formed an important theme for one of the most prominent foreign films, I do not know why this phrase jumped to my mind and I pick up this topic?
Maybe some of the actions of officials in the region or provinces that Taatsouramkanah that one of them works individually with the failure of the survivors, I do not know exactly , but I think that these words apply to us clearly, must be partial The successes are an integral part of the development and only failure
ours all.
We need to re - evaluate the economic management over the past decade and what we want for the future, otherwise the issuance of the law in parliament , with the disabled for years in implementation means that failure does not mean decentralization, and the issuance of ministerial orders and disabled by the directorates means failure also does not mean
decentralization.
And therefore we have to choose a clear path of economic management either decentralization as correct or delivery centralism and the last , despite all its flaws , but it is better than
chaos administrative.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]