Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    The Court of Cassation issues a decision regarding one of the federal decisions (documents)

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 272655
    Join date : 2012-12-21

    The Court of Cassation issues a decision regarding one of the federal decisions (documents) Empty The Court of Cassation issues a decision regarding one of the federal decisions (documents)

    Post by Rocky Fri 31 May 2024, 4:20 am

    [size=35][size=35]The Court of Cassation issues a decision regarding one of the federal decisions (documents)[/size]
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    [/size]

    Policy

    [size][size]
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.][/size]
    05-30-2024 | 14:38
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    [/size]

    Source:
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

    8,171 views


    Today, Thursday, the Federal Court of Cassation issued a decision regarding one of the Federal Court’s decisions regarding the retirement of a judge.

    [size]
    [ltr]








    0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%





     [/ltr]

    The decision included consideration of the ruling issued by[url=https://www.alsumaria.tv/entity/3812751506/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%83%D9%85%D8%A9 %D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AA%D8%AD%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%A9 %D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%A7/ar/]Federal Supreme Court[/url]On April 15, 2024, a decree was issued in violation of the rules of jurisdiction, which are part of the public order, an infringement on the legislative authority, and a violation of judicial affairs, so it is considered a void judgment, and the void judgment is neither binding nor conclusive.



    The court decided to ratify the discriminatory ruling, reject the discriminatory appeal petition, and consider the ruling issued by[url=https://www.alsumaria.tv/entity/3812751506/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%83%D9%85%D8%A9 %D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AA%D8%AD%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%A9 %D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%A7/ar/]Federal Supreme Court[/url]Non-existent.
    [/size]


    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

      Current date/time is Thu 27 Jun 2024, 9:58 pm