Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    an open letter from abdul-mahdi to barham salih and halbousi

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 280306
    Join date : 2012-12-21

    an open letter from abdul-mahdi to barham salih and halbousi Empty an open letter from abdul-mahdi to barham salih and halbousi

    Post by Rocky Wed 22 Apr 2020, 3:15 am

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]For Al Ahd News Agency
    [size=40]an open letter from abdul-mahdi to barham salih and halbousi
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] In the 4/21/2020 - 11:48 PM  77[/size]
    On Tuesday, Prime Minister Adel Abdul-Mahdi sent an open letter to the Presidents of the Republic, Parliament and members of the House of Representatives, while considering that the claim of some to specific locations such as a specific ministry does not make sense.
    Abdel-Mahdi said in his message, “The respected President of the Republic, Speaker of the House of Representatives, Vice-Presidents and members of the Council, I submitted my resignation on November 29, 2019, and we are nearing the end of April 2020 and no new government has been formed. And recently, Al-Kazemi, whose government is supposed to form before May 9, was charged, which reveals either constitutional breaches or serious deficiencies in constitutional applications and political traditions, or defects prevailing perceptions and behaviors of political forces, or societal oppositions that hinder each other, or regional and international balances. Stressful, and most likely all. "
    He added, "We exerted and exerted utmost efforts and promoted to provide support and assistance for the success of the duty-holders, away from our proximity or our distance from any of them, to realize that the current status quo is the most dangerous." Therefore, I send this message to my brothers and sisters that this may be the last opportunity to prevent reaching a completely dead end.
    "I know the courage of leaders and officials, and they sacrificed and sacrificed their lives and themselves for the sake of the country, so their positions are difficult to understand when they do not sacrifice their own visions and the interests of their powers in the face of this crisis that threatens the country." My perception is that there are wrong views - if they are not corrected and agree on common rules of conduct - then we will remain in a continuous cycle.
    1- The concept of the independent minister is not an absolute fact, but rather a temporary partial practice required by the reality of the state of political powers in successive governments, and the injustice of the election law and the law of parties, as they are against the will of the voters, which has generated quotas and a monopoly of power from the highest summits to the lowest. So the call of the independents came in response to all this.
    2- Many forces say they exercise their right to demand specific ministries according to the election results. And their argument is what is happening in other countries. And we saw that this is a false comparison. There, majority governments form one party or a coalition of parties, according to the electoral curricula.
    In those countries, there are integrated practices that make the party live with its fans and the public live the life of its party. The public contributes to various channels in the elections of party leaders and charts of programs, while we are far from all of this. The separation between the public and organizations is getting bigger, without serious treatment. Despite some progress in the recent elections, but we have not finally settled on the appropriate system that achieves the political majority, is matched by the political minority or the opposition, and protects and adapts fairly to national equilibrium so that the concept of citizenship can prevail. The participation of all government winners distorted the work of the House of Representatives from large blocks supporting the government, and others opposing it, to individual and collective conflicts over the sources of power, locations, and ability in the country, and blowing up the concept of separation of powers. All this has lost the country and the unity of the philosophy that organizes its work and the ability and integrity of the authorities to lead and manage the country.
    3- The claim of some to specific locations, such as a specific ministry, does not make sense. If a program in this ministry told me, this violates the government curriculum, which leaves no room for doubt that the desire will be to benefit from the ministry instead of benefiting from it according to a unified program for the government.
    4- In our circumstances, it will not be possible to completely absent the parties from the sites and the curricula, and it will not be possible to deprive the taxpayer of the right of choices to nominate, accept and reject. It is they who will vote in the House of Representatives, and it is they who will bear the greatest responsibility in the government. He stressed that "a mediating agreement must be reached in polling the opinion of the parties or in nominating those who meet the conditions agreed upon nationally, and allows - in return - the person in charge of the last word to choose the ministers, especially since his decision will not be final, as the last word will return to the parliament in a negative vote or Positively, pointing out that “the situation is not ideal, but if we put the worst prospects in the event of failure, and we all have the necessary flexibility, it is possible to reach a compromise.”
    We indicated, "If this third attempt at commissioning did not succeed, would anyone expect the fourth or fifth attempt to succeed?" Especially that our resignation was in response to a call from the authority and popular forces to find a solution to the impasse that the country has reached, stressing that "the goal was not to change people, but to change equations."
    He pointed out that "the continuation of a resigned Prime Minister to the government of conducting daily affairs is the survival of the previous equations and leads to inertia and emptiness inevitably, for this we cannot continue, and my answer was categorically rejected by all those who open me and with insistence from fundamental and influential parties that they are ready to facilitate the return from the resignation, especially since they did not Vote on it in the House of Representatives, "explaining that" the equation of my government with the conditions that are present is no longer able to manage the country's conditions properly. My understanding is that any government in our current circumstances must satisfy two basic matters. ”
    1- National consensus or a majority that can support the government, which the current government has practically lacked, even with theoretically available. What was mentioned above about the parliament, the blocs and the government is sufficient, and the signal is understood.
    2- The international and regional imbalance in Iraq. Not necessarily because of a mistake we made, but to extremist policies imposed by others, and no Iraqi Iraqi government can match them. When the friendship of one side becomes conditional upon the hostility of another friend, Iraq - according to our national experiences - will gain little and lose a lot.
    And in “In my message on 2/3/2020, I called for an extraordinary session to resolve the election law, the constituencies and the commission, and to set 4/12/2020 as the final date for the elections, and nothing happened, and they wanted the crisis to continue. There is no agreement on a new government, nor does it define an end to the crisis through early elections. The result will necessarily be the continuation of the day-to-day government and its full responsibility for difficult and complicated conditions, which cannot be continued, calling for “enjoying the required flexibility and reaching compromises to form a new government that can administer elections and have the powers required to manage the country's crises, especially amid huge developments that have become Great countries are worried about their future, including the collapse of global economies, oil prices, the Corona pandemic, and the persistence of terrorism and other thorny matters.
    He stressed, "I will take the appropriate and decisive stance in light of the results that you will reach in the next few days."


    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

      Current date/time is Tue 05 Nov 2024, 8:46 am