A deputy clarifies the main point of disagreement in the Federal Court law and talks about a "safest

[size=52]A deputy clarifies the main point of disagreement in the Federal Court law and talks about a "safest option"[/size]

[size=45]Today, Thursday, a member of Parliament, Ahmad al-Jubouri, affirmed that the main contentious point in the Federal Court’s law is the insertion of debt into a court that examines political decisions, while noting that the safest option at this stage is to amend Law No. 30 of 2005 in effect and that an interim court be formed. For two years.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Jubouri said, "Any procedure we work with should be consistent with what the street and the people want, which demanded early elections, and the reference indicated that important matters such as amending the constitution and important laws should be carried over to the next session," indicating that "the completion of the Federal Court law in light of Unstable conditions and the lack of complete harmony between many blocs, in addition to the existence of the general budget law, makes us feel the importance of not rushing to legislate a law for a federal court that politicizes partisan and sectarian, given that the parties will nominate legal scholars and experts of Islamic jurisprudence.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Jubouri added, "The main problem is not in the essence of the Federal Court’s law, but the real problems lie in the constitution. Therefore, if the blocs want to build a state, they must amend the differences in the constitution and end the intersections in it and many of the foundations that have established quotas and sharing in all state institutions." Pointing out that “the qualities found in jurisprudence experts or legal jurists are all present in judges, and the legislator had to clarify the paragraph related to experts and jurists by making it that the judge should have experience in Islamic jurisprudence and the law and the problem ends and the nominating body is the Supreme Judicial Council as it is an independent body And we move away from party nominations.[/size]
[size=45]He stressed that "the main contentious point in the law is the insertion of religion into a court that examines political decisions, as clerics and authorities are responsible for the religious matters that they give to people. As for whether to come and enter the Federal Court with the presence of clerics, this is not correct, because the dispute will be present before That they are chosen accordingly, returning to judges is an important matter, and we have experience in selecting candidates for the Federal Court of Cassation, which is no less important than the Federal Court, and its judges were nominated by the Judicial Council without any problems, stressing that "the safest option at this stage is to amend the law in force No. 30 of 2005 and to work on the formation of a temporary court for two years because the current circumstances do not qualify for the preparation of a fateful and very important law, such as the Federal Court Law.[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]