Observers rule out the success of the framework's efforts to form a government headed by the Sudanes

POSTED ON[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] BY [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[size=52]Observers rule out the success of the framework's efforts to form a government headed by the Sudanese[/size]

[size=45]Baghdad/ Firas Adnan[/size]
[size=45]Observers have ruled out the success of the current efforts of the coordination framework in forming a government without the approval of the Sadrist movement, pointing out that the political process has reached the stage of failure and with it, the parliament should be dissolved and early elections held.[/size]
[size=45]Political expert Ziad al-Arar said, "The coordinating framework, over the past months, has been accustomed to the same dialogue, that it is trying to show itself to public opinion that its hands are open to all to form a government."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Arar added, "The dispute is greater than the issue of the government and the mechanism of its formation, and the fact that the political process has reached the stages of failure par excellence."[/size]
[size=45]He pointed out, "The Iraqi people had another two elections sector, with a rate of up to 80%, as a result of the failure of the political forces to build bridges of confidence with the citizen."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Arar stated, "The idea became obligatory to put forward a new vision, and the Sadrist movement was a race with it by putting forward an idea to manage the state by returning the democratic process to its normal state, reviving it again and restoring confidence in the Iraqi citizen."[/size]
[size=45]He pointed out that "the coordinating framework, specifically the State of Law coalition bloc, stood against the political majority that the bloc's leader, Nuri al-Maliki, had previously demanded."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Arar stressed that "everyone has felt since 2010 that there is no solution to the political crisis, with the quotas and leadership remaining."[/size]
[size=45]And he believes, that "the Sadrist movement, when it presented its idea of ​​making changes in the state administration, did not speak alone, but rather brought partners with it, represented by the Sovereignty Bloc and the Kurdistan Democratic Party, and therefore what the Sadrists are asking for was not a novelty to seize power."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Arar accused the "coordinating framework of having sought over the past period to thwart the project of the national Sadrist movement by various means and mechanisms to preserve the current reality, on the grounds that the situation cannot be transformed into a political majority."[/size]
[size=45]He finds, "The Sadrist movement has reached a conviction, after nine months of tug-of-war, that there is no point in negotiations and dialogue, and there must be a new map and withdrew from the political process."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Arar explained that "the other side, after the Sadrists withdrew, began promoting the idea of ​​dialogue, but the question that should be asked is: What is the dialogue coming from? Is there a consensual government? The Sadrists rejected this idea from the beginning and withdrew from the political process."[/size]
[size=45]He noted that «the mere idea of ​​the presence of the Sadrist movement in the next government is a provocation to them, as if the framework wants to satisfy a number of ministries».[/size]
[size=45]Al-Arar concluded, “The Sadrist movement will not accept being in a consensual government as the coordination framework calls for today, and if we assume its acceptance of it, it will lose its audience and prestige after it established a national project, and I do not think that the Sadrists will err in this direction.”[/size]
[size=45]He ruled out the other political expert, Manaf al-Moussawi, that «the coordination framework achieves his efforts to form a government in light of the current differences».[/size]
[size=45]Moussawi added, "There are many problems, especially with the popular rejection of this political class by the rules of the Sadrist or Tishreen movement."[/size]
[size=45]He pointed out that "reaching solutions to the crisis should lead to consensus with the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the Sovereignty Bloc, which are allies of the Sadrist movement and refuse to advance any step without consensus with the Sadrists."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Moussawi finds that "the popular choices have become clear and expressed by the leader of the Sadrist movement Muqtada al-Sadr on more than one occasion, which is to dissolve parliament and go to early elections."[/size]
[size=45]He stressed, "The presentation of the coordinating framework for his candidate does not mean that things are completed, and the tripartite alliance that brings together the Sadrists with the Sovereignty Bloc and the Kurdistan Democratic Party has also presented its candidate, but he was unable to form a government."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Moussawi went on to say that "what the coordination framework talks about will not solve the political crisis, but rather complicates the political situation in conjunction with the calls for the demonstrations that are currently taking place."[/size]
[size=45]The coordinating framework seeks to announce a large coalition that includes many political forces for the purpose of forming a government by its candidate, Muhammad Shiaa al-Sawadni.[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]