Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Legal: There is no value in questioning a minister in an outdated government..but he should not esca

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 280493
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    Legal: There is no value in questioning a minister in an outdated government..but he should not esca Empty Legal: There is no value in questioning a minister in an outdated government..but he should not esca

    Post by Rocky Sun 20 Feb 2022, 3:03 pm

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    Legal: There is no value in questioning a minister in an outdated government..but he should not escape accountability
    February 20 2022



    There are no rules for holding a caretaker minister accountable (Facebook)
    Ultra Iraq - Editorial Team
    The former head of the Integrity Commission, Judge Rahim Al-Ugaili, wrote an opinion on the question of questioning or holding a minister in a caretaker government accountable.
    share
    Rahim Al-Ugaili says that the constitution did not establish rules for questioning the minister in an out-of-state government
    The retired judge wrote a post on "Facebook" in conjunction with the escalating debate between Finance Minister Ali Allawi and the Sadrist movement, represented by its leader Muqtada al-Sadr and the first deputy speaker of Parliament, Hakim al-Zamili.
    Read also:  [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    Allawi refused a request to host him again in the Iraqi parliament, declaring that he would request a vote of confidence in him.
    Al-Ugaili said in a blog post that "the constitution and the internal system of the House of Representatives and the law of the House of Representatives set rules for questioning the minister in the government during her tenure and arranged for him to be considered resigned if confidence is withdrawn from him."
    He added, "But it did not set any rules for questioning the minister in the expired government (such as the current government), which is a resigned government since the parliament itself was dissolved. He is an out-of-term minister. There is no realistic value for questioning him according to the rules of ministers accountability in the constitution."
    However, Al-Ugaili added, "But the absence of constitutional or legal provisions regulating the accountability of the minister in the expired government does not mean his evasion of accountability. It is not acceptable for any executive to evade oversight and accountability, even if it is by virtue of the resignation, as long as he exercises executive powers and powers, even if they are limited."
    He continued, "Therefore, the accountability of the minister in the expired government is subject to what is decided and established by parliamentary norms, and these have no rules or limitations, but rather are established by practices and precedents."
    share
    The minister in the caretaker government can be referred to the parliamentary investigation or to the public prosecution
    In response to one of the commentators regarding hosting the minister in the caretaker government in Parliament, Al-Ugaili said: “Not for the purposes of withdrawing confidence from him because he has already resigned by virtue of the constitution, but for the purposes of imposing transparency in his actions and practices and obligating him to explain them to the deputies and the people, and to notify him and his government that he is subject to oversight, accountability and exposure. This may result in his being referred for parliamentary investigation, the Public Prosecution, or the Integrity Commission if he finds crimes in his actions and decisions.
    Earlier, the leader of the National Coalition, Iyad Allawi, defended the Minister of Finance, Ali Abdul Amir Allawi, stressing that the decision to change the exchange rate was shared by all the blocs within the government.  
    Allawi said in a blog post followed by "Ultra Iraq", "The change in the dollar exchange rate came after consultations with all the blocs that participated in the government, and therefore trying to evade responsibility for this decision or throw it at others will not deceive the people."  
    He added, "Travel ban orders are issued against those convicted or involved in suspicions of corruption and crime by the judicial authority and cannot be subject to whims and moods and will not frighten the efficient and impartial such as Ali Allawi, especially as he asked the Speaker of the House of Representatives to hold a session of the House of Representatives and vote on confidence in him as a minister and allow him to throw A word on economics and the exchange rate.
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Sat 09 Nov 2024, 12:18 am