Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    The federal government relies on the ruling that the law ratifying the Navigation Regulation Agreeme

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 278395
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    The federal government relies on the ruling that the law ratifying the Navigation Regulation Agreeme Empty The federal government relies on the ruling that the law ratifying the Navigation Regulation Agreeme

    Post by Rocky Thu Sep 14, 2023 7:50 am

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    [size=52]The federal government relies on the ruling that the law ratifying the Navigation Regulation Agreement in Khor Abdullah is unconstitutional[/size]
    • Today 14:09




    Information/Baghdad..
    Today, Thursday, the Federal Court ruled that the law ratifying the Navigation Regulation Agreement in Khor Abdullah was unconstitutional.
    The court said in a statement received by the “Information” Agency, “The Federal Supreme Court bases its ruling on the unconstitutionality of the law ratifying the agreement regulating navigation in Khor Abdullah on the fact that the Constitution of the Republic of Iraq of 2005 represents the interest of the Iraqi people in their past, present, and future. It was the result of an arduous and bitter struggle.” For all the people of Iraq, Arabs, Kurds, Turkmen and all other components of the people, and everything contained in it represents a faithful translation of the blood of the martyrs of Iraq, and was achieved by building democratic institutions and guaranteeing freedom of opinion, thought and belief after the people had been suffering under a brutal, oppressive, tyrannical regime for more than 30 years and because the constitution had become effective after The people held a referendum on it in accordance with what was stated in Article 144 thereof, so deviating from the constitution constitutes a crime described as a crime of violating the constitution or high treason.”
    She added, "The Federal Supreme Court based its ruling on the unconstitutionality of Law No. (42) of 2013, the law ratifying the agreement between the government of the Republic of Iraq and the government of the State of Kuwait regarding the regulation of navigation in Khor Abdullah, on the provisions of Article (61/Fourth) of the Constitution of the Republic of Iraq for the year 2005." It is not possible to implement a legal text that contradicts the Constitution despite the validity of that text because its implementation mechanisms have been disrupted, as the (defunct) Revolutionary Command Council is responsible for ratifying international treaties and agreements in accordance with Law No. (111) of 1979, the Treaty Contracting Law, which was in effect at the time of enactment of the law ratifying the aforementioned agreement. It no longer existed before, and the type of government system, its institutions, the powers of those institutions, and the mechanism for exercising those powers differed completely, and all of this became established in accordance with the Constitution of the Republic of Iraq.
    She stressed that “it is not permissible to suspend the provisions of the Constitution in exchange for local legislation that contradicts it and is effective before the enactment of the Constitution. Rather, local legislation becomes in violation of the Constitution and other legislation resulting from it is subject to being ruled unconstitutional whenever it is challenged.” End/25
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Tue Oct 01, 2024 6:11 am