Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Al-Hakim: There is no justification for amending the electoral law

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 280229
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    Al-Hakim: There is no justification for amending the electoral law Empty Al-Hakim: There is no justification for amending the electoral law

    Post by Rocky Tue 09 Apr 2024, 5:24 am

    [size=38]Al-Hakim: There is no justification for amending the electoral law[/size]


    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

    April 9, 2024[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    Baghdad/Al-Masala Al-Hadath: The head of the National State Forces Alliance, Ammar Al-Hakim, confirmed that there is no justification for amending the current electoral law, calling for “gradual amendments to the constitution in the agreed upon articles.”
    Al-Hakim said during the Ramadan evening at the Al-Bayan Center for Studies:
    Overall, the experience after 2003 proved to be successful, regardless of the circumstances, circumstances, and challenges. The performance could have been better had it not been for those challenges that came into play, including the concerns of some countries in the region about the dangers of democracy to their countries and the fear of its transfer from Iraq to those countries.
    Another challenge is the region’s lack of knowledge or neglect of Iraqi diversity and the true size of the components, in addition to the challenge of terrorism in all its forms, which has targeted Iraqis everywhere, without forgetting the media influence in inciting society and striking the components together within a specific international and regional agenda.
    Among the challenges also is the lack of distinction between political competition and political intersectionality, and the negation of some over others for considerations, including components, including the fear of some of the success of others.
    We confirmed that Iraq has overcome all these challenges in record times compared to similar challenges experienced by countries in the region.
    We showed that many countries in the region and the world look at Iraq with admiration and read its developments in a positive way based on data, numbers and roles. We called on elites and researchers to conduct objective scientific studies on what Iraq was like before and after 2003 in all fields, and we made clear that the impact of corruption and delay does not It lives up to what is said about failure and corruption by others.
    We stressed the need to break the deep-rooted negative impression that Iraq is mired in corruption and failure, and we explained that participation rates in the elections are linked to political culture and the level of political clamor. We also expressed our refusal to evaluate participation in parliamentary systems by the same criteria that evaluate participation rates in presidential elections, and we called on us to consider the weights. The changing political forces in the recent electoral rounds, as we have shown that parliamentary systems do not require a large parliamentary bloc for the prime minister, but rather this is linked to the consensuses, balances and understandings that require the formation of the largest bloc, while a distinction must be made between parliamentary elections and local elections when talking about evaluating participation rates, and let us call the elites. To encourage people to participate in the elections.
    We explained that the optimal electoral law is the one that balances the number of seats and the number of votes. We expressed our conviction in the fairness of the current law and cited the recent elections in which no red complaints were registered, and that amending the law requires justification, and this is impossible in the current law, which has not been tried in parliamentary elections. We said that what was being raised about the electoral law was not discussed in the political corridors and was not mentioned on any agenda in the political meetings.
    We renewed our call to lower the nomination age, and stressed the importance of the approved age for party formation being consistent with the approved age for nomination to the House of Representatives, and that the performance of some young representatives weakened our position to lower the nomination age.
    We stressed support for the private sector and stressed the move with an integrated system to support and protect production, and the importance of exiting the rentier economy. We renewed the call for the five-factor agriculture, industry, tourism, investment and technology, and we showed that there is a positive accumulation in some sectors, especially in the field of agriculture and industry.
    We renewed our condemnation of the bombing of the Iranian consulate in Damascus, and attributed the act to the Israeli entity’s suffocation and inability to achieve an achievement on the ground, and killing innocent people is not considered an achievement. We also indicated that the Israeli entity’s step is an attempt to scatter the cards in the region and open more than one front to close the Gaza file, and we expressed our understanding of the response. The Iranian statement said that it will be diverse, multiple, and gradual, and we praised the Iraqi role in dealing with Gaza politically, relief, and media.
    We explained that paying the salaries of the region’s employees did not exceed the decision of the Federal Court, and we explained that the approved banks are under the supervision of the Central Bank, and we consulted the court’s position before taking the step.
    We emphasized the role of the State Administration Coalition, as it discussed, in the presence of the Prime Minister, his upcoming visit to the United States of America. We confirmed that the visit will discuss the activation of the Strategic Framework Agreement with the United States. We pointed out the importance of ending the mission of the international coalition to combat ISIS with understanding and dialogue and replacing the relationship with it with bilateral relations between Iraq and some countries. The coalition countries individually according to common interests and preserving the country’s sovereignty.
    We explained that wisdom is part of the coalition of state forces and has paid the price of its orientation, which sees a strong state as a guarantee for all. We emphasized the importance of the state’s economic philosophy and cumulative construction and the importance of seeking international experiences and training Iraqi crews.
    We pointed out that submitting lawsuits for political matters to the Federal Court is wrong, and we recalled the many political crises that Iraq went through without referring to the court to preserve its legal status. We also called on the political forces to assume their responsibilities to solve the problems.
    In the decision to dissolve the Kurdistan Parliament, we explained that the court refused to extend the work of the Kurdistan Parliament by analogy to the constitutional text in the Federal House of Representatives, and that the decisions taken after the extension became invalid, including the election law, which necessitated a return to the old electoral law.
    Sinjar, unfortunately, has become an international issue and a conflict zone. We expressed our rejection of the Turkish army’s entry into Iraqi territory, and we called for the implementation of the constitution so that Iraq should not be a corridor or starting point for threatening neighboring countries.
    In the file of the Turkish President’s visit, we called for the trilogy of economy, security and water in the relationship with Turkey, and we renewed the call for the Kurdistan Democratic Party to reverse its decision not to participate in the upcoming elections in the region.
    We called for the tolerance of targeting and appalling because it is the cost of confrontation. We affirmed our support for all political forces of all stripes, including the civil movement and its political forces. We also called for unity in the Civil House and openness to the political forces close to it. We explained that amending the constitution stems from the need for amendment, and we stressed that The social contract is a necessity if the balance in political representation is not disturbed. We made clear that amendments require broad consensus, and we called for gradual amendments to the agreed-upon articles without breaking or imposing wills.
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Tue 05 Nov 2024, 12:16 am