Winning companies and the challenges of privatization

Winning companies and the challenges of privatization

2/18/2016 0:00

Mohammed Sharif Abu Mayssam

prevail a state of anxiety and anticipation in some public companies because of the risks to the changes and challenges of classified some of its employees in «preparation for privatization» box they came at a time of rising restructuring of public companies logo, if we know that some of those companies trump was working system of salaries set by the government that preceded the current government as a self-financing companies, along with work incentives system that achieves the workers more than the monthly income, but the labor ladder new salary, which has damaged much Bmdjulat workers, especially workers in the lower rungs of the career ladder who move respondents amendment in the previous peace, came in conjunction with the low level of income of those companies due to variables raised eyebrows and wonder among workers who found themselves over a sharp drop in their income.

some of these workers are affiliated to the General company for land transport, which was a winning «on saying extent» by the continued work with the Ministry of Commerce to transfer the ration card items, but the Ministry of Commerce, according to those recently adopted by the private sector and on the ground its fleet in the transfer of ration card items, making the revenue of this company goes down to the lowest level which portend making a losing company par excellence, and citing these workers, the anxiety prevails in the corridors of the company by the likelihood of coverage privatization, or the so-called corporate restructuring program, does not preclude the House of our conversation with them «intentionality» in making losing their company.

the national oil company and in the same context, oil officials and some called on stakeholders in the oil and economic affairs in an economic seminar to establishment of a national oil company of the pan domestic oil companies, and assuming management of the oil sector affairs instead of the oil Ministry, claiming ease of management and labor in accordance with international contexts that rely on companies and leave governments for monitoring and supervision of the laws relating to the functioning of the market economy, implementation, and some went to so far as cross-media media calling for the privatization of the oil sector in order to develop this vital sector, he said, promising stage of incorporation system market like never mightiest capitalist systems in the world. Based on the above, the case of mismanagement and corruption by the quota system, which I did I did it in the maturation of capital among some influential individuals the groups, which are meant for the consequences now be employed in the transfer of public property to the private in a legitimate framework, claiming salvation of corruption, were not sufficient and it seems to convince public opinion in the foundation for the privatization of profit-making companies, as well as lack of suitability as an excuse to fight privatization in the most dangerous sector of the economy is guaranteed by the Constitution as the property of the Iraqi people, a sector of oil. It is natural that the workers at the General Company for land transport and other profitable companies in their perceptions goes to the likelihood of «intentional» the aim of privatization they see the transformation of their company's profit position to a position of loss suddenly, it is natural that the observer sees in some individuals of officials or employees in the oil sector and in the business sector's remarks, trying to establish in the near term for the privatization of the oil sector in the second phase of the transition to a market economy. Thus, we have to wonder whether the privatization project in which real reform to achieve development and a minimum of social justice? Are we obliged to resort to privatization absolutely by external wills and we move to a market economy? Here we have the right to answer these questions after the initiation of the administrative reform in the institutional structure and after the trial of the corrupt and re minimum of stolen funds at the very least, otherwise we will be launching the coup de grace on the last hope can be achieved through the revival of the spirit of justice and social. the possibilities of public ownership that the least that can be caused to the Iraqi state from the damage caused by stripping future governments from public ownership possibilities, is converted into a discredited state sovereignty with distinction in the midst of political Altsarat economic domination operated by the arms of globalization, companies in the Middle East, as well as the occurrence of Iraq in a bus zone doctrinal and sectarian entities that could be fueling their collision at any time dominant actors on the cultural tools of globalization sees it, neither the sovereignty of a country like Iraq, run by a government based on their revenues on taxes and fees to finance its defense .. not rule her in front of market movement controlled by capital companies are able to withdraw their money at any moment .. not rule them pending receipt of the democratic game, however, the capital, with enough to be the legislator and the sergeant is the owner of the capital to be able to dominate the political game and economic and even social and repeating its presence in the formation of successive governments, who will be the decision-maker even if not within government cabin .. Furthermore the importance of public ownership in shaping the prestige of the state in a tribal society governed nerve rooted in social selection. With all due respect to the other opinion .. wonder «who tells us a number of public companies belonging to the US Pentagon and NASA and the Department of American intelligence?» in the country to adopt a system approach to the market and bodes Blabralah capital.